towards a better life for others

Just continuing some thoughts from last time when I was talking about some ideas for my personal philosophy.

I think one of the greatest mentalities that I had while growing up in a religious context was the thought that everything was part of God’s plan. And I think for me, that made me a relatively passive person growing up. Going into high school, I became a little more proactive as I tried to succeed within the high school environment. But it was really when I went to America and when I went to Brown, that I was shocked by the pro-activeness of Americans around me. The American arrogance was on display all the way from the classroom to the dance floor. And I think there are people who would criticize that kind of behavior, especially those from cultures in East Asia and the Middle East, where hierarchical and respectful/subservient cultures are still the norm. But for myself, it was a realization of how my passivity was not a good combination with my already mellow personality.

Around that time, I started having a parting with my religious upbringing. Looking back at writings deep in the older archives of this blog site and other pieces of writing from the time, I realize a lot of it was me wrestling with the idea that everything was part of God’s plan and purpose, the debate between free will and predetermination. 1

And I think the last four of five years have been a slow progression of a more proactive mentality in my life. Moving half way across the world for college, deciding that I wanted to study a field that no one in my family had any experience with, computer science, deciding that I wanted a career in computer science, being part of a non-profit that brought me to East Africa, moving again across the country after graduation to a new city, and now starting a new chapter at a startup.

Once I moved away from the idea that there was a life I was supposed to live, and instead moved towards the idea that life was what I wanted to make of it, a lot more options and choices became available to me. Once I gave up on the idea that there was a life I was supposed to have, it freed me from the fear of failing, which has given me a new desire to take on opportunities with unknown futures.

Once in a while, I get into a ‘how the heck did I end up here’ mode and start questioning all the choices I ended up making, and sort of look at it from a tabula rasa perspective. Even at my age, I think the socialization we acquire from media, from our peers and from our families can be stronger than we believe. So questioning some of these beliefs can yield interesting insights. Where did this notion of having a family and having two children come from? Where does this notion of finding a job that pays well come from?

But on the flip side, the sense of freedom has also presented me with more choices. Having choices are great but having all these choices have also made me deeply question my own existing decision making criteria because to make a choice you need to know what is it that you seek, and how you need to go about achieving it.

One consequence of believing in this notion of free will is that I felt like the possibilities of life expanded greatly but I also experienced a profound sense of lost. If there is in fact no plan, and in fact no purpose, that what are we all really living for? Why do we live and breath to make it to the next day? A personal journey is necessary from here for you to decide what is that you want to live for. Each is extremely personal and the conclusions we derive from are all different, which is what after all makes humanity so interesting.

That mental exercise that eventually led me to write this post and the previous one, thinking about how I want to measure success on my own terms, how I want to live my life, and how to get there.

I think my idea can be expressed very simply by a line I found for my last post ‘The measure of a civilization is how it treats its weakest members’. Helping the weakest members of humanity is a goal I’ve decided to work towards. My idea is simple, which is to minimize the number of human-years that are lost to preventable causes, whether health, social or political in the most resource-efficient way possible.

The goal is kind of ridiculously broad and honestly not very useful at all, but I can’t really narrow it down for you right now. This goal has the difficulty of being incredibly difficult to measure. So the proxy I’ve decided to measure it is by the following activity. Opening up an issue of the most recent copy of the Economist and make sure that there isn’t something that can be done easily to help preserve the human potential that would be otherwise lost. ‘Done easily’ is a terribly vague word here as well but I can’t think of anything better right now.

I think the difficulty in staying true to this goal is finding the inspiration and the courage to keep going. I believe I am more afflicted by the tragedy that I observe than the admiration that I feel for individuals who have scarified to improve the world. So the difficulty moving forward will be able to tune into this emotion by connecting with a large group of people and their circumstances. Humans have the strange tragedy of being better at empathizing with individuals rather than groups, thus our fascination with storytelling, heroes, martyrs. It is individuals acts of heroism and courage that have inspired us, but how do we wire our brains to appreciate the small acts of heroism that many people commit each day? And how do we force our emotions to focus on the larger picture rather than the tragic stories we read? How do we become data-driven in the handling of our emotions?

Hopefully this post will act as a promise that I have made to my future self of the life I will lead.

1 And I think looking at the matter now, I used to have a dislike for religion in general. But now I’ve realized that my anger is directly towards organized religion and not the underlying faith. Organized religion just like any another institution of power, can and will be abused at some point. And the part I realized was that the people representing this institution do that represent the beliefs and convictions of all the followers, just as political parties. I think growing up I only met people in that practiced both, as one would in a church setting. I have nothing against anyone’s faith, except when it tries to dictate the actions and behaviors of others who are not part of that faith.


One thought on “towards a better life for others

  1. hey man, we’ve talked about this endlessly so you probably know what i’m about to say, but i’ll say it anyway

    i totally get where you’re coming from and i have been there through your trajectory, and i think it’s inevitable that for people with our upbringing and background, things can get easily convoluted together, family expectations, societal pressures, academic requirements, organized religion, but I would encourage you to learn to separate those things while at the same time recognizing the interconnections

    my hypothesis is that most of our frustrations stem more from the first two things, family expectations and societal pressures (returning to the family line of business, finding a safe job with material possessions etc.) that inevitably get linked to other things that are expected of us, going to chapel, saying those prayers that meant little to us growing up, but I think I went through a similar phase when I was at Choate, and realized that there is so much more for us to explore and to choose

    first point on free will and choice. I think having the freedom to choose what we want to do and say is not at all incompatible with having faith; in that having faith, in this regard Christianity for me, has nothing to do with not having the freedom. Sure there are guidelines to what we should or should not do, but in no way does that take away from my agency to do or not do certain things. At the end of the day, if I want to fuck up, I can totally do so and God is not holding my hand or tongue when I do so. We are given total freedom in making those choices for ourselves. The catch is whether or not we like those guidelines, or we feel those guidelines are just restrictions on our freedom.

    And here’s where I have a probably different viewpoint from you. Especially after Choate and going to Stanford, what I realized was that not only do I still have that freedom regardless of whether or not I follow my faith, but knowing, and trusting that I am free to make decisions that are already planned for me, is one of the most beautiful things ever. It gives me a sense of security and confidence that at every step of my life, even when at the surface it looks like it’s all going to shit or we made a terrible mistake, it is part of God’s plan. Now, this does not mean there is a predestined plan that we have to take, on the contrary, it is not for us to KNOW or to GUESS what the plan is, but to merely make the decisions we believe to be right based on all the facts that are in front of us, supplemented by the guidelines that we may or may not choose to follow. This in turn allows me to just live life as I want to making my own choices, yet at the same time respecting the consequences as being the right thing that should happen.

    In conclusion, there is no inherent contradiction between having faith, free will, and a predestined plan, in my point of view, it is how we use that freedom, what we choose to live by, and how we make decisions and live with them, that we should measure ourselves by.

    Curious to see what you think about this.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s